Consciousness Fragmentation

Introduction

The three first essays on the basic truths have shed light on the nature of the absolute truth and the absolute reality. However, we have yet to uncover the true relationship between us, the world, and the supreme consciousness. While it has been alluded in the previous essay that everything other than the supreme being itself is a manifestation or variation of it, we have yet to truly describe the process that transforms raw consciousness into the world that is. As such, we will do just that in this essay, and explore the fragmentation of consciousness into the seven billion and more human beings as well to every thing that exists. This serves as bridge between the basic truths, or the natural reality and to what we are, the derivative reality.

Supreme Consciousness

It is good to start from the basic truth as we usually do. In the three previous essays, we have determined the existence of the truth, as well as the nature of reality described by the truth. Essentially, the absolute truth dictates that the absolute reality is of consciousness. Consciousness in the most logically reducible means in the epistemological context is an object able to perform observations of reality and thus produce knowledge. We also determined that the consciousness has two essences, that is of intelligence and of emotions or feelings. Intelligence being the deliberative and calculative part of the consciousness, while emotions and feelings being the ultimate expression of the freedom of consciousness, in the logically reducible means being the result of the observation of contradiction or order between the consciousness and the rest of the world.

Fragmentation

While alluded in the previous essay, the matters of fragmentation or manifestation will be discussed in further detail in this essay and section. The consciousness as we know has a nature of being self causation, and as such it has no “unique” features. A comparison may be made with visible light, we know that colorful light, which has “unique” characteristics are not the ultimate form of visible light. Visible light in its purest forms has no color, a form which we often call “white”. However, white is not a color, it is in fact a condition of no color. Color is gained by visible light when we divide it into groups of specific spectrum ranges, and such divisions are what enables us to see color.

The consciousness is no different, in the purest form, it has no labels or characteristics. That is it has no “physical form”, no identity, no name, no unique characteristics. In the natural sciences, it is equivalent to pure energy. As such, everything else in the world that has some sort of unique characteristic, such as a specifically constant physical form, or a name, or an inherent unique physical property, is merely a variation or manifestation of the supreme consciousness. The reason this property of consciousness is labelled fragmentation is because each individual manifestation is only a fraction or fragment of the supreme being. It is finite and limited in nature, however when all is combined, it regains its infinite and limitless nature.

Natural Scientific Parallels

In the study of the natural sciences, the concept of consciousness fragmentation is equivalent to the law of conservation of energy. And in fact, this conservation law is the bridge between the natural sciences and the social sciences, where natural sciences studies the manifested aspects of consciousness, and social sciences studies the nature of the fragmented consciousness. Everything in existence as we know it, is technically just energy, even mass is equivalent to energy. This is proven by Einstein’s equation E=mc^2, which means that a small amount of mass contains ridiculously large amounts of energy. This proves that matter is merely a manifestation of energy, and various forms of energy, such as kinetic energy, heat, and potential energy is merely manifestations of energy as well.

The parallels doesn’t stop there, as we know matter has very finite properties, that is it adheres to specific rules and laws that is the natural consequence of the mechanism of energy. Energy on the other hand, does not follow rules and laws as much as matter does. Matter for one can never reach the speed of light. However, light, a purer manifestation of energy always goes at the speed of light. And hypothetically, the purest forms of energy, which is tied with pure consciousness would probably bypass any scientific or physical laws such as the speed of light and so on, after all the laws themselves are a manifestation of the pure consciousness and energy.

Significance

Why is this idea significant though? Well I believe it is fairly obvious, after all the theory of fragmentation would explain the relationship between us, ourselves, and the supreme consciousness. Though I would not explain the details of the relationship in this essay, as that would be on the realm of ethics and sociology. Regardless, the theory of fragmentation serves as the important link between the absolute truth and ideology, energy and the world, and of course, the supreme consciousness and us, human beings. This enables us to explore other topics while having a strong foundational truth, and also be able to examine and observe the world through the right perspective, that is the perspective of the truth.

Purpose

This too has been alluded in the previous essays, but I shall explain this more clearly and more detailed. As you see, the supreme consciousness changes like us, and it used to be in the state of death, meaning it is in a state of complete suffering and eternal damnation. It is in a state of attachment and sin, and thus the fragmentation exists for the sole purpose of solving the problem. Fragmentation serves to make the solving of the problem much more effectively and efficiently as it would expose every part and sides of the consciousness, both the righteous and sinful ones. The theory is that the righteous ones would help the sinful ones and thus everyone will be righteous.

The way fragmentation works can be compared to a run down building. The building is damaged severely, and most parts of it is damaged. If we try to fix it as a whole, where do we even begin? As such, it is better if we divide the damaged building to various chunks, and we fix the building per chunk. This means we can fix the building wholly quite effectively. And dividing it into chunks also means that we can be much more careful in repairing and thus the building will come out much better than if it is undivided, as each chunk is treated like the entire building. It is treated with immense care and thus results in high quality work. That is the essence of fragmentation, to expose the worst sides of consciousness, and resolve it entirely.

Conclusion

This essay is short, because there is nothing much to speak of here, the basic summary is that everything in this world is a manifestation and fragment of the supreme consciousness. Such fragmentation is done to ensure that all of the supreme consciousness atains salvation equally and wholly. Just like a damaged building, you can’t just repair the walls only or only the superstructure, you need to repair every corner and every edge of the building, down to every small crack and every small imperfections. The rationale being if you leave a crack unchecked, it will spread and thus cause the building to become even more damaged. That is all I have to say for now, have a nice day and see you later.

Drug Culture

Introduction

There is an interesting culture dominating most of the world right now. It is the culture that stagnates the world, and the reason for materialism to continue manifesting in the first place. This culture is a seductive and a tempting one, and seems to be the much better than chasing a non existent impossible to reach truth. Yet, the very moment you step into it, you die, you become attached, and it damages you in the worst ways possible. This culture, is known as the drug culture, a culture which hides all of the real conflicts, and makes us all seem like happy people. The drug culture is our ultimate obstacle between us and freedom, yet at times, is the only way for us to go on, numbing and pleasing, hides the dark truth, this is the drug culture.

Drugs?

First of all, why do I call this culture the drug culture? First, what is the essence of a drug? Not medicine, but drugs, such as opium, meth, marijuana, ecstasy, and other form of narcotics. Is it because they affect our brain in such ways? Or is it because they cause many sensations, often a pleasing one? No, it is because they are addictive, we keep coming back to it no matter the consequences. It is because they are an instant pleasure, and often requires the least effort. This is why I call this the drug culture, because it involves around things that we are addicted to, and we depend on and if we lose those things, we will often get withdrawal syndrome. Well then, shall we start exploring this interesting culture?

Mechanism

Culture here refers to the common habits of people, that eventually grew stronger until it manifests into a tradition. While some traditions are good, this kind of tradition is very damaging and harmful. It is the habit of using drugs to produce illusory happiness, and move on with life, without really attempting to solving the problem. Though, what is a drug here? Is it addictive substances? No, drugs in this essay and for this purpose shall be defined as any object or perhaps activity that humans use or do to numb away their displeasures and perhaps replace it with pleasure. Of course, if that is all the person does, then it’s not a drug, it only becomes a drug when people becomes attached to it, that is they become dependent on it, and if the drug is taken away, they will exhibit a withdrawal syndrome.

Drugs can manifest in many forms, even things that aren’t thought to be drugs. If we examine the West, we can see that people are generally more cheerful, this is not because they have less problems than us, but they are able to suppress the problems better. And of course, I have evidence for this, it is wide known how the West has a rampant culture of alcohol, drugs, and free sex. You know, the stereotypical liberal culture, or if it isn’t liberalism, then fanatism in other ideologies. The three most powerful drugs of the West all contributes to the suppression of their problems in the West, and maintaining a fake aura of happiness. Wait, fanatism? How does fanatism has anything to do with drugs?

You see, there are many ideologies that provide people comfort, sometimes different people have different drug ideas. Eventually they become very devoted and thus fanatical to their ideas as it is the only thing that would help them cope with their sufferings and problems. The reason many people are fanatical is not because of a genuine desire of the truth, if they actually do then they won’t be fanatical in the first place. It is because they desire acceptance and a feeling of importance. By supporting some ideology that few supports, we feel like we are better than others and know more, and fills us with a fake sense of pride and confidence. Well, while the world seems full of dangerous addictions, surely our friends can help, right?

Social interaction and social relationships are absolutely important for human beings, after all that is simply the nature and basic truth of humanity. However, if we can’t control ourselves and solve our conflicts, friends can be a drug as well, how is that? You see, when people have problems, they may have their friends to help them solve the problem. This kind of friendship is perfectly healthy and beneficial for everyone. However, when one have friends to suppress the problems so that it doesn’t bother them, and simply ignores the problems, and needs to keep laughing and having fun with their friends so they forget that the problem exists, then friendship becomes a drug.

Of course, it is still a question on the matter of how things can turn into drugs. You see, human beings will naturally encounter problems and conflicts in their lives, it is inevitable, however one can choose how to address the issue. Some people would solve it right there and there, thus not needing any drugs. However, there are people who feel disturbed by these problems, and for whatever circumstances, if they attempt to solve it right there and there, it would cause other problems such as disturbing their work or somehting. Regardless, a problem can not disappear by ignoring it, and if unsolved will actually grew bigger. And soon it would simply get worse for the affected.

If a problem is unsolved for too long, it can become complicated enough that it may actually take the person down into despair. At this point, the most important thing to do is for the person to get out of despair and get their life together. And of course, pleasant activities that may eliminate their despair is useful, and many people would solve the problem once they realized that it was a mistake to let the problem go. But many others would pick up a pleasant something, and be addicted to it, to numb their pains away. This becomes dangerous, as we become more addicted to it, until it becomes a large mess. However, not all drugs would produce incredibly negative consequences if large doses are taken. Free sex for one, has less obvious negative consequences, and thus is more appealing in the West. Some drugs have also less obvious consequences as they don’t require increasingly adding dosages to keep numbing the pain, something like alcohol. But, in our world today, is it all harmful?

Fine Thread

The drug culture, is sometimes necessary as an ultimate last resort. Especially when the problem is actually external, and we have no power to solve that problem. For example, the oppressive capitalist system we are all in today. In such cases, we are most of the time powerless to solve the global contradiction, and all we can do is try to fulfill our goals within the given constraints. Regardless, the contradictory system itself will cause us suffering, not because we are at fault, but because the system itself is against our human nature. At that point, the only thing we can do is try to do things that can keep our spirits high, have friends, play games, and while we become victim of drug culture, sometimes it is necessary. And even if the problem is internal, engaging in drug culture so we don’t get despaired while solving our problem is also a good thing, as eventually when the problem is solved, we would naturally be put off by the drug culture. But of course, we’re here to examine the negative consequences aren’t we?

Stagnating Consequences

Drug culture becomes especially harmful when it blinds people from the actual problem and makes them dependent on the drug, without ever solving the problem. And this is not theoretical, this is a real problem and its realistic consequences has happened. Why don’t we examine the organization that should be promoting the truth, the Church? The Church has not made any significant breakthroughs with their ideologies and seems to be satisfied with its current self. In other words, it is stagnating, no progress is made, why is that? This is because if the Church questions the illusions it propagates, it would escalate into a larger conflict, furthermore believing that whatever we believe now is the truth is much more comforting than always having our doubts in our toolbox.

Another evidence is from my school. While again, it is only my observations, but I have observed that many students still don’t have a clear purpose in their life. That is certainly a problem, but it seems they never really paid attention to that obviously critical problem. Instead, I see many of them simply engage in drug culture, either in gaming, sports, or the most severe of all, social life. Many students in fact feels uncomfortable and complains about tasks, or even praying in the chapel or the church. These things are disliked because it forces students to face directly with their problems, and thus they dislike it. And drug culture isn’t the final form of itself, if left unchecked, it will grow stronger, into something we all know and love, or hate today, materialism.

Materialism

If one engages in drug culture for too long, they may lose sight of what’s actually important, that is solving their problems or in this context, the truth. Eventually, they become attached to their drugs and they start to see their drugs as their true goal. Obviously, drugs are often materialistic in nature, because once you’re dead, and you never engaged in drug culture, you are truly free and happy, all your problems are solved, and there is no need for you to engage in illusory peace and comfort. Conflicts manifest in the material world, and should be solved there as well. However, while they manifest materially, their nature actually transcends the material world, as well as the peace and happiness in solving the problem. But that isn’t easy is it?

Eventually, people start to focus only on the positive consequences of solving the problem, that is the happiness and pleasure, without solving the problem itself. Eventually they become stuck with the material world and become attached to it. After all, there are many things that can provide you with pleasure and happiness without having you make the effort, such as sex or alcohol. Eventually, this becomes a very hard rooted system that becomes increasingly harder to shake off. Communists have attempted to remove the drug culture, but they failed, as they only focus on solving material problems, and not the true problems. However, why is it that this drug culture keeps growing? Why is nothing stopping it? Or perhaps, what caused it in the first place. I have no definitive answer, but I do have some opinions.

Causes

In this section I shall explain my opinion on the original cause, and the perpetuative cause of drug culture. You see, the consciousness first emerged as a dead, depraved, and broken being, with heavy suffering. This early suffering is what I believe to be the first trigger towards the drug culture. The consciousness then starts to be attached towards certain parts of itself, in order to satisfy their needs, and thus the drug culture is triggered. This is only logical as the being has not gained any knowledge or experience on how to solve their problems, which has the root of lacking in love. Since no one is there to love the being, as they are alone, the being descends into deep drug culture.

While eventually the being splits into the world now, the drug culture perpetuates in the material world. Of course, there has been numerous attempts to uproot that culture and finally eliminate materialism once and for all, but the system itself is too strong for a mere mortal to uproot. Furthermore, the materialist system encourages people to keep engaging in the drug culture, thus staying ignorant and not knowing of the truth. This is done by constant pressure towards every individual, that is the pressure to be happy, the materialist system creates an apathical society that usually abandons despaired and needy citizens, thus there is a pressing need to stay “happy”. And this will go on, unless someone comes in and changes it.

Conclusion

The predecessor of materialism is the drug culture, which is apparent in our materialist capitalist system of today. It is unfortunately a natural part of the consciousness, but it doesn’t mean it can’t be changed. Regardless, if this culture is maintained for too long, I can predict that Jesus’ day of judgement and the forecoming suffering is not that far. Technically, materialism and the drug culture is exactly the same, they just refer to different aspects of the same thing. Materialism refers to the institutionalization and systematization of it, while the drug culture refers to the habits and practices inherent of materialism. By any means, that is all I have to say, have a nice day and see you later.

Consciousness Theory

Introduction

In the previous essay of the observer theory, we have established the nature of the ultimate reality, that is of consciousness. However, in that essay we have disgracefully reduced consciousness to merely an entity that can perform and record observations of the external world, and in fact also observe itself. We have not determined any other significant nature of the consciousness. Unlike the previous essays, since we have successfully determined that everything in the world does exist, though is a part of the absolute reality that is consciousness, we will be starting with the current scientific knowledge, instead of the very first deductible truths as we did previously.

Logical Consciousness

When it comes to the most basic characteristics, the primary feature that differentiates a consciousness from other objects is the ability to produce knowledge. While it is written that consciousness is essentially an observer, that is written as we are analyzing the ontology of the issue, that is the matters of reality and existence. Of course, robots with sensors may be able to observe the world and store such information, they require other premises to support their existence. And while at this point consciousness seems very similar to intelligence, because it is a form of intelligence, there is another side of consciousness that requires our attention as well.

Mere Intelligence

While it is true that intelligence and consciousness is not the same, that is consciousness is indeed intelligence, but intelligence is not always consciousness. Of course, we had no choice but to assume consciousness as intelligence in the previous essay as that is all we can know at that time. This is because we are unable to determine the existence of anything in the previous essay, and our utmost priority was to determine the basic nature of the ultimate reality. And while the previous essay does reduce consciousness to more of this all seeing eye that always observes everything, and thus enable us to determine the existence and nature of the world through knowledge. However, such reductionism is only necessary in the previous essay, as consciousness is more than mere intelligence, why is that?

Let us examine what intelligence actually is. By essence, an intelligence is any entity able to perform logical reasoning in order to achieve any purpose, for example, a standard calculator is already a form intelligent entity. As it is able to perform logical reasoning, though a very limited form of it. A more advanced form of intelligence is a computer or an artificial intelligence, that can even obtain information about the world to create the best decision and perform logical reasoning more effectively. The most advanced form of intelligence is technically the human being, the embodiment of consciousness, but what makes the consciousness so special and different from traditional intelligence?

You see, traditional intelligence such as the computer or robots are all run by codes and programming. They can never violate the rules set by their creators, and they will always run exactly as predicted if we analyze the rules. Even if one is to create an artificial intelligence so similar to a human being, it is still created using rules, and they are still dictated by rules. This means that it relies on something else to work, and thus to exist as well. Consciousness is essentially the ultimate intelligence, it does not require to be dictated or caused by anything else to work, instead it causes itself and it dictates itself to work. It’s causation is not external, instead it is self causation. In simple words, a consciousness is free.

Emotional Side

Since consciousness is a free entity, that is it is self causing and in the logical context, it is a conclusion that also acts as its own premise, an unmoved mover, an uncaused causer. This has a logical consequence, that is the observer of the consciousness is itself, as we have known, the consciousness doesn’t only observe others, it observes itself, and since there is only the consciousness, whatever it observes, it is a part of itself. Of course, there are two sides of the consciousness, a derivative part, that is the part of the consciousness that originates from the consciousness itself, and the natural part, that is features of the consciousness that is uncaused and unmoved.

Derivative parts of consciousness includes everything else but our bare consciousness, things such as the material world is a derivative part of consciousness, it is a part of consciousness but not the ultimate form of consciousness. The natural part is the inherent and basic parts of consciousness that has no other causes. Something like intelligence and our capacity of rational thought is a natural part, however one question can be posited about something else, emotions. Are emotions a natural part or a derivative part of consciousness?

The answer is actually simple, emotions are a natural part of consciousness. You see, it is impossible to reduce the world into mere logical reasoning and so on, as if there is only logical reasoning, there would be no emotions in the first place, and there would be no conflicts in the first place. However, one might ask, what is an emotion in the first place? After all, it seems that emotions does not fit into the deduction of the universal truth. And I can see why it hardly fits, however it does not mean we are unable to examine and produce an answer to the emergence of emotions.

Notice that no computers or artificial intelligent being will have emotions, as they are only dictated by rules that we the ultimate intelligence write. And what is the key difference between us and the computers again? We are capable of observing ourselves, and thus is self caused, while computers are incapable of observing themselves and is externally caused. Emotions have something to do with that. You see, emotions are the logical consequence of our observations of our internal self. Observations of disorder and contradictions will often produce a negative emotion, while observations of order and the truth will produce a positive emotion. For example, if we have our loved ones die, we become sad as the condition of having someone we hold precious lose their life and thus unable to love us anymore is a disorder. Meanwhile, when we get a high score in our tests, we become happy as that condition shows order and truth, that we have achieved our goals, thus we are happy.

By essence, having emotions is the truest expression of our freedom as the conscious being, however as I have said, emotions and the heart is much more than that. The heart is what gives us purpose and meaning in life, it is what enables us to appreciate beauty, it is what enables us to love others and to care for them. If logical reasoning dictates what is true and so on, the heart dictates what the truth means. As such, this is why I seem to protest at the previous essay, what is the truth worth if it has no meaning? However, now that I am able to express the true beauty of the truth, I am much more comforted. I digress, it seems high time for us to explore the meaning and purpose of all of this.

Purpose and Meaning

We have established the existence of the truth, what it is, the nature of reality, the nature of consciousness, and seems we have explored every nook and cranny of the basic truths. However, one question remains, what is it all worth? What is the purpose of us existing? The purpose is simple, what do we feel? What do we feel right now? Perhaps, how do you feel at this moment? Do you feel happy? Or do you feel sad? As you see, purpose and meaning all depends on the heart, the emotions. When we feel sadness, do we enjoy it? Is it a sign of order? No, what we enjoy is happiness, as happiness is a sign of order and perfection. Alignment with the truth causes happiness.

But what kind of happiness do we aim for? Many people claim that they aim for happiness, but they all fall astray and seem to be hooked on petty things. That is because they aim for materialistic happiness, what we must aim for is true happiness. And how is true happiness achieved? It is achieved through achieving perfection, that is order, perfection and truth. We did not emerge as perfect beings, we emerged with imperfections, conflicts, contradictions, problems. Such conflict and depravity causes us suffering, our task is to escape that suffering, and that is by seeking and living the truth. As a result, our aim is not necessarily happiness, but the truth and to live the truth, that my friends should be our ultimate purpose in life.

Conclusion

It seems this marks the end of the basic truths saga of my essays. We started our journey with an inquiry into the absolute truth, and finally we discover it. Next, we determine what kind of reality is described the truth, and found that it is consciousness. Finally, we determine what is consciousness and the nature of it, and then we also determine the purpose and meaning of all this. While I can talk about how this relates to the idea of God and so on, that is for another time. My goal through this trilogy is expose and share the basic truths, which I believe shall be the roots of all problems and also the roots of all solutions. Regardless, I believe that is all I have to say, have a nice day and see you later.

Observer Theory

Introduction

This is the next essay in the establishment of a universal objective truth. We have ascertained the existence of the truth, which is the existence of reality. However, we have yet to determine the nature of such reality, that is what kind of reality exists. That problem, while mentioned in the previous essay has not been described in full detail. As such, this essay serves to describe such reality using the theory of the observer. In summary, the theory aims to determine what kind of reality exists, and will also concern the issue of knowledge and its relations with reality.

Reality

We have determined in the previous essay that reality indeed exists, and there is only one reality as a whole, there can not be more than one reality. Even if there is more than one reality, there must be an ultimate reality, that becomes the source of further realities, in which case it is merely another iteration of reality. And in the end, we still end up with one true reality, as that is the only reality guaranteed by the truth. Still, what kind of reality exists? Is it the world? Is truth reality in itself? As of now, we have no evidence to determine what is reality, as such, we will assume that reality is as we see, the world.

Universe as Reality

Let us first assume that the universe is reality, meaning that the universe is real, and everything within it is real. Of course, we must always attempt to question the existence of whatever it is that we assume to be real. Let us assume the existence of the planet earth. How do we determine the existence of the earth? That is indeed hard, so why don’t we assume the existence of something smaller and simpler, such as a car. Let’s say we own a car and that car exists. How do we know that the car exists though? Here, we will be examining the practical evidence, and not theoretical evidence.

The car exists, why do we say so? Perhaps because we can see  the magnificent red mustang, listen to the thunderous noise of its engines, smell the choking scent of gasoline, touch the smooth body of the car, and for the adventurous of us, taste the bitterness of the metal hull. Well sure we can describe every property of the car possible to be described, but we’re not alone now are we? What if no one else can see that car? Or perhaps the car only exists to us? If that happens, it is possible for us to be delusional and we should go to the doctor immediately, perhaps we’ve been smelling the exhaust pipe for too long.

For the sake of argument, let us assume that everyone else agrees that our beautiful red mustang does exist. Of course, does that mean that the mustang does exist? No, not yet, as while everyone else corroborates it, who or what is corroborating their existence? After all, if the people who claim that mustang to exist are just our own hallucinations, well the mustang might not exist either. In the end, we’re stuck, we have so much information, that seems to support each other’s existence, yet in the end, we have no idea what supports the existence of all of it. This is the crux of the problem, the observer problem.

Observer Problem

The essence of our dilemma is that we become separated from the world, we can observe and record information regarding the universe, yet we are wholly unable to determine the truth of such information. At this point, we seem to be hitting an utter dead end, however we must remember that we still have the truth, that inevitably and ultimately, reality must exist. So, why don’t we take a look at this problem from another perspective? Instead of us, the world, and the red mustang, why not just us and a random object?

Imagine that there is only an object and a person. While technically we are separate from those two, we are assuming that the person is ourselves and thus we can only obtain information regarding anything from that person. Now, the person here can be described as an observer. The observer records the properties of the object, and say that the object is a apparently a ball. The observer can detect the ball and record its various properties. Of course, in the knowledge of the observer, such ball exists. Yet, if both the ball and the observer exists, then there are two realities, which makes no sense, how do we resolve this contradiction?

Let us assume that the ball exists independently, and if that is true, that would mean that if the observer is gone, the ball will still exist. That seems odd now doesn’t it? Because it is odd, as you see, the ball is dead. It is unable to record any information about the outside world, the observer on the other hand can. Now since the observer is the only thing that can create observations and record such observations of the ball within themselves, what do you think will happen once that observer is gone? No information can be obtained about that ball or object. In fact, we can’t even know if there is any object at all, since the observer which can gain information, does not exist. This claim however, has serious implications as follows.

The common claim of the world is that the world exists independently of observation. This makes absolutely no sense, as if there is no one to observe the world, how can the existence of anything be determined in the first place? Such as if a tree falls in the woods where no one has been there or is there, effectively, the tree never existed, let alone fall. Going back to our problem, an observer is required to obtain any information regarding the object. Without it, we can’t even guarantee the existence of the object. It seems we have reached another dead end. Of course, we can never solve this problem, unless we recall the previous deduction, reality exists.

Resolution

There is an observer and an object, the observer observes the object. The observer is the only entity able to perform observations on the object, and thus determine the existence and properties of the object. The question is simple, which exists between the object and the observer? We know that if we assume the object, unable to perform observation, exists, then it inevitably does not exist as nothing is there to observe it. However, if we claim that the observer exists, and the object does not exists, that does not make sense as the observer claims the existence of the object, and thus we have information that is created. And if we claim that both the observed and the observer exists, we contradict with the truth that only one reality exists.

Let us return to the basics, that reality exists, and only one reality is guaranteed to exist. What happens if we apply it to our problem? We have always been assuming that we can only assume the existence of either the observer or the object, however there is one other scenario that would allow us to explain the observation of the observer and the existence of the entities. It’s simple, that is we must assume that the object and the observer, is actually one and the same. Wait, isn’t that ludicrous? No, of course it isn’t, what it means that the observer never observed anything, what the observer is observing, is themselves. What this means though in the end?

True Reality

From an absolute logical perspective, only one conclusion can be taken, that is only the observer exists. Everything else, is merely another form of the observer, and while in the logical sense it is an observer, there is another name that it goes by, the consciousness. In the end, the ultimate reality is of consciousness, and everything else is just another form of it. This means that our red mustang, is technically just another part of ourselves. In the end, the only thing that exists, is ourselves, but does that mean we are alone and everything we see is a hallucination? Of course not, they are just part of ourselves, and we are always in company, in the company of ourselves.

Conclusion

Honestly, I didn’t wish to write this essay, it’s very depressing to me, as when you have to make this into a purely logical deduction. As consciousness is more than just logic, there also exists feelings and emotions, which is another property of reality. Perhaps the only reason I am depressed as logical deduction can not give out a purpose of life, logical reasoning only describes life and how it is. We need our feelings to actually shape ourselves and find a purpose. However, I know there are stubborn people who still deny the truth, so I have to create a rational explanation on cosciousness, though I seriously feel frustrated for reducing consciousness to merely observers. We’re not just observers, we are beings with emotions. Regardless, that is all I have to say for now, have a nice day and see you later.

Forgotten Truth

Briefing

This writing will not be a full descriptive essay as my two previous essays, it will be an outpouring of my thoughts and concerns. Now, if you look at the title of this complaint, it says “Forgotten Truth”, now the “Truth” part is already covered in the previous essay on the universal truth. Here I will describe the “Forgotten” part, that is how the world has forgotten the truth, abandoned it, and has set itself towards a path of utmost destruction. Now since this writing will be more disorganized than even my rants on atheism and religion, I hope you are ready. Good luck.

Critique

So, my concerns actually originate from some peculiar chapters where Jesus just went on and on about suffering and judgement bla bla bla, all that eschatological mess. You got it, it’s the judgement day, I seriously find it weird how Jesus would describe it in such a diabolical and descriptive manner. That was before I fully immerse myself in the truth, and at that time, I realized everything. Judgement day, or at least the suffering preceeding it is not some sort of punishment from God for our sins, after all good guy JC took the punishment for it. So what’s with the suffering?

You see, the suffering caused will be a natural consequence of our world’s flawed system. Wait, what?? So are we serious that the world is controlled by capitalist patriarchs and we must revolt bla bla bla?? Well, that is in the right direction, but without a logical argument, that’s just plain conspiracy theory, which I seriously don’t like. So, why is it that the world will descend into chaos and suffering? It is simple, let’s talk about logic for a bit. You see, if a statement is aligned with reality, it will never cause any contradictions or conflict, which means it will always be jolly fine. However, if a statement is false, aka contradicting with reality, well no matter how you try to mask into the truth, in time, the statement will contradict with reality, and break down entirely. This statement breakdown is fine if it’s only theoretical. But what if you manifest that rubbish statement into reality? Hohoho, well you’re just asking for trouble mate.

People think that the current system of democracy in the Western world is the best system ever. Well of course, since it has “liberated” many people in the third world as well, and it has turned our society into the best version of the world ever! Yea sure there’s poverty and so on, but that’s the fault of the poor right? Oh, and it’s also because of terrorism and socialism, they’re the cause of the world’s sufferings! Meanwhile, the capitalist  free democracy of the Western world is our only hope against the evils of communism and fascism of the radical Islamists! Not to mention that everyone is equal and we must tolerate and accept every ideology ever, because we live in a  dictatorship democracy run by the  capitalists and the bureaucrats people, right right?? And if you disagree, we’ll call you a communist anti free speech fascist and make your life so hard, that we’ll feel pity over you and we will make you rest in peace!

Huff, fine enough sarcasm, let’s get serious. Now, imagine the faulty statement is implemented into reality, which it does in the form of capitalism and materialism, and we create a global political economical social and moral system based on that faulty statement, guess what will happen? I believe the answer is obvious, at one point the system will break down and create mass chaos. Well, the system today has never broke down and caused mass destruction right? RIGHT? I wonder about that. I seriously wonder. Maybe all of you are forgetting the great depression? Or perhaps the two world wars in the bloodied 20th century? And wasn’t there some recessions already in the 21st century?

And I won’t even start on my own country, Indonesia is seriously having some problems with the Islamists, and everything is teetering on a fine balance. Don’t get me wrong, president Jokowi is a very good president doing everything that he could to help us, the people. However, there are too much enemies, and that is why he can’t make large breakthroughs, because the revolution, must come from us, the people. The problems of Indonesia itself is not caused by Jokowi or Ahok, but it’s the system itself. The system is contradictive with the basic nature of reality, which is why it causes problems, such as free sex, suicide, radicalism, atheism, materialism, and so and so. Which means if a system is truly based on the truth, no problems should emerge. But since it’s obvious that there are problems, it means the system is not based on the truth. Wait, did I hear something, oh God! It’s the scream of capitalist spies liberals saying, “PEOPLE ARE FLAWED THERE IS NO PERFECT SYSTEM ALL SYSTEMS HAVE FLAWS BUT WESTERN CAPITALIST FREE DEMOCRACY IS THE BEST FREEEEEDDDOOOOOOMMMMMM!!”

Now now, I don’t accept that kind of bullshit. After all, to say that there is no such thing as perfection is the same as saying that there is no such thing as the truth. After all, truth is the very definition of perfection. Something is perfect if it is aligned with the truth, meaning it does not contradict with reality. And I have personally written out what would happen if the truth doesn’t exist, read my essay and if you seriously still think I am a madman, then do prove that I a madman, please. So, a perfect system does exist, and it is possible to implement, it’s just not easy, but certainly reachable, after all, we are all fragments of God, right? Regardless, I am not going to comment on how the perfect system is, because I have made it, what I want to discuss actually is evidence that everyone is high on a very addictive drug known as the material world.

Evidence

Okay, I get it, this evidence is technically my observations, and yes say whatever you want people that it is unreliable and so and so whatever. You don’t believe it? Well that’s your choice, if you wish to ignore the glaring contradictions of this world, go ahead, that’s your choice. Anyway, my first case is actually close to home. You see, in Indonesia, the education in Senior High is specialized into IPA, or natural sciences, and IPS, social sciences. You see, there is a disturbing, a VERY  disturbing trend in this matter. In the lower levels, students study both natural and social studies. And since I just graduated out of junior high, I am witness to whatever happens in my school.

You see, social studies and natural sciences are not on the same degree, while the teachers insist that both sectors have equal oppoturnity and so and so, which I must agree, the reality is just bitter. Because no matter how you look at it, social studies is technically treated as somewhat inferior to natural sciences. If you get a high score in social studies, it’s practically normal, but if you score high in natural sciences, you are an actual genius. Of course, I’m not putting blame on anyone, but if some people finds my writing offensive, go ahead, I don’t really care anyway. Regardless, this is even obvious when you ask people on which major in senior high do they wish to take, natural or social sciences, most would answer natural sciences, and it’s true. But why?

You see, my opinion is that natural sciences, or materialism is just so much more appealing than social sciences. Because even those who joined the social studies would prefer the business section, which in the end is capitalist dream. Why the hell is this? You see, in both studies, or in any study at all, you should have a basis, that is a truth that becomes the basis of that study. Now, the basis of natural science is simple, you simply observe the world, if needed with instruments, record it, and create conclusions. That is the core of the scientific method. Now I am not discrediting natural science, it certainly is helpful and beneficial, and has progressed the world very far. But what I mean is, the crux of natural science, or at least traditional materialist naturals science, is that reality is as our senses interpret it. Which means we don’t even need to doubt ourselves. This policy of not doubting ourselves has created a society of people that would break down if they doubt themselves. And thus we move to social sciences.

Social sciences is basically the study of humans, and their interactions, it is practically just social anthropology in fact. Now, to do this, you must discover the essential nature of humanity. The problem is, while it exists, very few people are hardwilled or strongwilled enough to actually doubt theirselves. Or even doubt the existence of their loved ones, because that radical skepticism is actually required so we can prove the existence and the content of the essence of humanity, that is the truth. But wait, isn’t the idea of doubting and finding the truth a philosophical issue? And not a social anthropological issue? That’s the point, the whole point of philosophy is to constantly criticize anything, until you find you can’t criticize because if you do it would just stab you in the back. And look, realistically, there hasn’t been genuine consensus in philosophy, just like the lack of consensus in social sciences. It’s just that, social studies are much more exhaustive in mental strength, as if you’re not willing to accept the probability that you may be alone in this world bla bla bla, you will have a hard time doing anything. Because how can you understand the social interactions and structures of the world if you don’t even understand the basic core truths of that matter?

Philosophy used to be allied with natural sciences and somewhat against social sciences, but now, philosophy is a core aspect of social sciences. However, for a person to be interested in philosophy, they must be equipped with the skill of doubt and critical analysis, and an unwavering commitment to the truth. And this brings us, to the students. You see, in my observations of my colleagues, I have seen that many of them doesn’t really have a set goal, like some may have passions for their talents, but in the end, if you question them hard enough, they won’t be able to give you an answer on the core truth. Now they are not to fault there, after all the system made them unable to have strong willed principles for the truth. And thus they are directed towards easier and more guaranteed paths, the material path, gain wealth, give wealth, and be good, without questioning the meaning of those paths. Basically, the system naturally inhibits the formation of individuals that actually has an unwavering commitment to the truth.

Basically, a path to find the truth and commit to it is dangerous business. As it will in then cause unstability and conflict. Though all for the better. As it is, our society and systems are more interested in creating a stabile society focused on materialism rather than progress or the truth itself. After all we live in a post truth world. Of course, if anyone with an unwavering commitment to the truth attempts to dismantle the system, the system would then identify them as fanatical radicals, equate them with hardcore fascists or Islamists, and perhaps be charged with trying to break apart  the nation. But look, no matter what, a contradictive system can never be stabile, the materialists will in the end regret it, over and over again. Regardless, that’s how it is today.

Now, atheism. Oh boy, if I share this in the dark corners of the internet, I am sure to trigger many edgy atheist fanboys who thinks they are intellectually superior to the world by denying the truth. They say that the belief in God is harmful, well let me tell you what, it is their belief that is harmful, don’t believe me? I’ll show you. SO, if a system is faulty, why is our system still running? What the hell is preventing a mass revolution of the proletariat against the edgy materialists at the top? In fact, why is everyone still acting moral as if there is morality in the first place? Why is there still people that vehemently abstains from free unguided sex parties, or dangerous drug trades, or excessive use of alcohol? What is the fine thread that the society hangs on? What is it? Just what?

I’ll tell you, it’s GOD, that’s right, GOD, the same entity that is called out as evil and genocidal and immoral, described as ridiculous by atheists! When do you realize, that the concept of God, is the only thread of truth, preventing everyone from descending into eternal chaos. The belief that there is a higher truth than mere materialism, that is the reason why society is not dead yet. Oh, and what about the atheist nations? Such as the Scandinavians? Aren’t they the happiest people on earth? Huff, I wonder about that. Well look, the data is pretty sketchy in my opinion. But in these situations, the only option is to compare with the truth, is it how it is? And happiness here probably means material happiness. Regardless, I am sure, if everyone is made atheist suddenly, you know what will happen? World War 3, and well it’s coming really. So, get ready folks. And I guess I’m done for now, as this is really depressive, have a nice day and see you later.

Universal Truth

Introduction

This essay is technically the English translation of the original essay, I won’t write this essay translated word by word. Rest easy though that the core message of both essays will be the same. To those frequenting my blog, many will know what kind of things I write. In my journey of writing and logical deduction, I have made many writings with ideas that I claim to be truth, ironically it is only now that I make an essay actually detailing the universal truth. The reason for this is because before, I did not have an actual formalized and laid out argument about the universal truth, only now I managed to write it in a decently organized and structured manner. As such, that is the background of this essay, I hope you enjoy.

Worries

Why is it that I am concerned so much about the truth? After all I’m only 14 years old, meaning I have only spent 14 years on this planet, what kind of wisdom does a teen that young has? Is it all just arrogance or delusions? Honestly, I’d wish I was just delusional, but it doesn’t seem so. It all started with an odd recurrence within my life, an extreme feeling of despair ever since my mom was taken away by the Almighty. I was confused as to the cause of my despair and suffering, and I looked everywhere, until I reached the truth. Then, before I realized it, my life has become very devoted, almost obsessed in finding this so called truth. It is only when I actually discovered the truth, that I realized what I just involved myself in. That is, with the knowledge of the truth, I must commit to it and thus my next mission is to spread the truth, which is why I am writing this essay.

To clear things up, I don’t view myself as an important person nor do I feel I have any significance within this world. I often look down upon myself and wonder, why am I doing this? As if anyone cares, and that’s the point. The more I understand, the more I realized the urgency of this “truth”, as I know that at this rate, the world will go into a terrible chaos and conflict if the truth is not opened now. Where is my evidence then? Well, I am witness to it, I thought consciousness of the truth and what is right, some sort of moral standard is a common thing and something widespread. However, what I see is the opposite, the truth is seen as the object of holy people and not something of common knowledge. In fact, I actually feel detached from the society as a result of the “truth”, while others are focused on materialistic and hedonistic desires. In the end, I can not let things go by like this, I must do something, and this is the least I can do for now.

Existence of The Truth

If there is anyone who dare says that the truth doesn’t exist, I must say that I hope they are prepared to change their beliefs very soon. What gives me the confidence to say this? You see, the implications of a truthless world is severe, as then it would render the existence of anything to be impossible. I’ll explain this later on. Regardless, I believe an inquiry on what kind of truth we are searching is needed. For the record, we are searching for a truth that is universal, objective, and is true in all circumstances without exception and unaffected by personal opinion. That is the truth that we are seeking, and I am confident enough to say that the truth truly exists, and I won’t claim this if I have no evidence, as such, let us analyze and scrutinize that evidence.

Evidence of The Existence of The Truth

The truth by nature is any statement that describes reality and is aligned with it, meaning that we can match the statement with reality and there will be no differences between the described reality and the true reality. As such, the reality described here must be the true reality, and not the ones we hope to be, i.e. fantasies and dreams. We can determine the truth of a statement with the laws of logic. Logic is essentially a study on how to produce information from existing information, one might describe it as information synthesis, however it is also a study of determining the truth behind the results of such synthesis. Basically, we can use the laws of logic to determine what is true, and it is only appropriate that we learn just a little about the laws of logic.

As we know, the truth is any statement that does not come in conflict with reality, in other words no contradiction is found between the statement and reality. In the laws of logic, statements go by the term “argument” and they are composed of two elements. These two elements are the premises and the conclusion. A premise is known existing information, while conclusions are new information that is deducted from the premises. Basically, a conclusion is a sort of description that combines existing information and states the consequence of such information. For example, we have two premises that is humans are mammals and all mammals give birth. We can then conclude that humans give birth. The specific details of this conclusion is related to a mathematical theory known as set theory, but I won’t go into details. Regardless, we have now the tools needed to determine the truth.

Seeking The Truth

If the truth is any statement that aligns with reality as it is, wouldn’t it make the truth very easy to find? For example, the earth is round, is that untrue? Of course, while most people would say that it is true, myself counted, we must still question the truth of this statement. That is what evidence do we have for such statement? In the logical context, the question is what premises do we have to deduce that conclusion? Of course, anyone can explain the evidence for the roundness of the earth, and I too can mention some explanations even if I am not well acquainted with the subject. The problem is, many people are satisfied with simply knowing the premises towards a certain conclusion, when in reality such premises are inevitably conclusions of other premises. As such, we must keep analyzing the premises until a point where all premises are proven true. And if we fail to do so, it means the entire line of reasoning collapses.

As such, why not try with a simple biological statement and fact, that is blood is red, perhaps we can find the truth through that. Of course, as usual we must understand the evidence or the premises that support that statement. And asking others won’t help though, as from peasants to doctors everyone will answer that blood is red. However, what kind of evidence do we have though? We can attempt to illustrate the premises and conclusions in an organized structure as follows.

(P1) If we see object X with condition Y, then that is the reality.
(P2) We view blood with the condition of red color.
(C) Blood is red.

This argument seems quite clear cut, at first glance that is. However, we must still examine this argument and determine whether it truly is true or simply looking like true. We can do this by examining the truth of the premises itself, which becomes the basis for deducting our conclusion. The second premise is obviously true, as that is the reason why we can say that blood is red in the first place. However, the first premise is the reason that validates the truth of the second premise, as such we must analyze that first premise. If we look at the premise individually at first glance, it’s clear that it seems quite fishy. As such, why don’t we try to illustrate the reasoning behind the statement that what we see is real?

(P1) Humans have eyes.
(P2) Eyes record visual information about reality.
(C) Visual information recorded through the human eyes describes reality.

Of course, this argument seems solid and irrefutable at first glance, but readers might start to understand that this argument too is suspicious. As you can see, both premises are starting to be quite difficult to actually prove. The first premise requires us to prove that the eye exists in the first place, and the second premise requires us to prove that reality outside of the human mind exists and that information recorded through the human eyes is indeed accurate. I can go on and prove it, however the point is clear that at this point in time, it is impossible to determine the truth of such statements. This is because for every statement containing a premise separate from itself, it requires us to determine the truth of such premises as well. In the end we simply keep trying to find more premises for the original premises and end up in an infinite regression, not a good thing at all.

As a result, we want to start from the beginning, the very beginning. That is we wish to seek a truth that can stand for itself, in other words its premise is itself, imagine a house that is also the foundation of that same house, that is the kind of truth we wish to determine. As without any external premises to prove, that truth can simply stand on its own without any form of external evidence, and as a result we can not question such truth any further and we can be convinced of its truthness. That kind of truth can be described as the Universal Truth. Before we continue, I would like to restate that the statements we covered previously is not false. As if we can say that it is false, it means we have evidence, however at this point in time, we have no evidence of reality whatsoever. What I wish to say is that the truth of such statements can not be determined. At this point, one might then conclude that there is no such thing as a universal truth, very well then, why don’t we test that argument as well?

It does not Exist?

Readers may begin to despair and think that the truth truly does not exist. However, I must say that such a claim does not leave us without any severe logical consequence. What are those logical consequences? First, I would’ve realized that this essay is simply meaningless and everything I have done up to this point makes no sense at all and that I am a delusional lunatic that thinks they are “special” or “important” when they are simply insignificant to the world. Regardless, while this seems insane, let us challenge the claim that the truth does not exist.

(P) The truth doesn’t exist.
(C) Reality doesn’t exist.

Well if that is not an obscurely vague and concise argument, I don’t know what is, furthermore how can there be only one premise for that conclusion? The truth is, I deliberately made the argument like that, in order to invite the readers to reach their own conclusions and have them use their rational minds. Regardless, there is a much more complete version of that argument, and weirdly enough, those two statements are actually interchangeable, how is that? First, we’ll need the definition of truth, “any statement that is aligned with reality as it is,” and now we can start to unravel this mystery.

(1) The truth is any statement that is aligned with reality as it is.
(2) The truth doesn’t exist.
(C) Reality doesn’t exist as there is no statement that can describe reality as it is.

(1) The truth is any statement that is aligned with reality as it is.
(2) Reality doesn’t exist.
(C) The truth doesn’t exist as there is no reality that can be described.

That, my esteemed readers, is the true form of the argument that the truth doesn’t exist and reality doesn’t exist. There is one difference between them though, the first form deduces the cause of the non existence of truth, while the second form deduces the consequence of the non existence of reality. In short, the first form shows an inference while the second form shows a prediction. Regardless, both forms have the same meaning, that truth and reality doesn’t exist. Is that it then? Is that the end of our journey? That is indeed what is being said by the atheists and materialists, however, fear not for that argument that the truth doesn’t exist has destroyed itself.

We still have one last hope, and that is the second method of analyzing an argument. If we previously we have only searched for the truth of the early premises, which I must say is actually the most effective manner, there is one more method, commonly used by folks who are just too lazy to search for the premises. This method, is to find contradictions within itself, basically if we search for premises, we search for contradictions between the statement and reality, here we search for contradictions between elements of the statement. An ideology is usually a series of arguments with their own premises and conclusions, now if we look deep enough, we may find contradictions that can actually self destruct the argument. This, dear readers, is our last chance.

First of all, there is no logical law that prohibits us from making statements describing statements. While usually a statement describes reality, we can create a metastatement, in other words a statement that describes another statement. Now, we will rewrite the arguments, but there are some additional sentences. The first is the actual statement, this is the statement that we wish to prove the validity of, and finally there is a metastatement, that is the statement that describes the truth value of the examined statement. Now, pay attention very closely, both forms will be written, as to make the truth clearer for all of us.

(S) Reality doesn’t exist

(1) The truth is any statement that is aligned with reality as it is.
(2) The truth doesn’t exist.
(C) Reality doesn’t exist as there is no statement that can describe reality as it is.

(MS) The statement that reality doesn’t exist is true.

(S) The truth doesn’t exist.

(1) The truth is any statement that is aligned with reality as it is.
(2) Reality doesn’t exist.
(C) The truth doesn’t exist as there is no reality that can be described.

(MS) The statement that the truth doesn’t exist is true.

Now, has the contradiction came to light? Ironic isn’t it, by claiming that no statements are true, we have indeed created a true statement. This statement is none other than the statement that the truth does not exist as well as reality. However, that means there are at least two separate statements that genuinely describe reality, and the very existence of these statements are sole proof that the argument in of itself is false and self contradictory. As a result, the argument self defeats, the truth exists and now we can create the true line of reasoning to reach the truth.

(1) The truth is any statement that is aligned with reality as it is.
(2) Reality doesn’t exist.
(C) The truth doesn’t exist as there is no reality that can be described.

(1) The truth is any statement that is aligned with reality as it is.
(2) Reality doesn’t exist.
(C) The statement that the truth doesn’t exist is true as there is no reality that can be described.

(1) The truth is any statement that is aligned with reality as it is.
(2) The statement that the truth doesn’t exist is true.
(C) The truth exists.

(1) The truth is any statement that is aligned with reality as it is.
(2) The truth exists.
(C) Reality exists as there must be a reality that can be described by the truth.

That is the ultimate truth, that reality exists and the truth exists, the truth of all truths, it is the truth that is independent and is indisputable, irrefutable, and applies to every edge of the cosmos in every time without any exceptions. Of course there are other methods to reach this holy truth as well, however I find the contradictive method to be the most reliable. After all, using that method we do not make any assumptions, and it is important to not make assumptions, especially baseless ones in logical discourse. This is because it is essentially a statement that we made up, most likely so the truth describes a reality that we wanted, and not how it is, though by doing that we never even found the truth, as it has been tainted by our personal opinion. Regardless, that is the truth that we have worked so hard to find.

So, it is irrefutable that reality exists, however what kind of reality? The answer is simple, that reality is also known as consciousness, one of the most important aspects of human life, yet the most unexplored, at least in my opinion. How is this possible? What kind of evidence do we have? You see, a conscious observer is required to obtain any information at all, if there is no conscious observer, the truth effectively doesn’t exist and that kills off reality. However we proved that argument to be self defeating which means there is consciousness. I can discuss this more deeply, but not today. Since we have ascertained that consciousness is the ultimate reality, what is the significance for us? This is the true purpose of this essay, to expose the meaning behind this elusive consciousness.

Truth of God

If one reads the subheading, they must already have a brief idea what is the significance of the truth of consciousness. As you see, consciousness is the only reality that can be proven to exist, and technically it is the only reality to exist. This brings an interesting question, that is what of all other things that supposedly exist? Such as mountains, people, forests, cities, stars and so and so? The answer can be found within the principle of the conservation of energy, it states that energy can not be destroyed nor created, it can only be changed. As a result, the same goes for the consciousness, which we can appropriately term as the true God. Everything else is merely a variation, manifestation, or reflection of the same reality known as God. And that is the ultimate reality of this world.

Conclusion

The conclusion has already been stated, that the ultimate truth is that reality exists and that reality is consciousness. It is ironic that people who denies God will eventually realize that logically, such a belief is nonsense, and when they claim allegiance with the truth, it is unfortunate that the truth will stab them in the back in time. Of course, the existence of this ultimate truth and reality should become our foundations of all other ideas, including but not limited to morality. As such, we may be able to discover a consistent nature of morality, perhaps. Of course, do I claim the truth espoused by this essay to be truth? Well, I do claim so, as a result if anyone has a higher truth than this text, then I challenge you to debunk every argument made within this essay. And should that happen, I will concede defeat and declare myself to a mental asylum or something. So good luck for those who has yet to grasp the truth, and for those who managed to do so, that is all I have to say for now, have a nice day and see you later.