God II

God II

Introduction

The existence of consciousness is definite proof for the existence of God. As a result, the existence of God is now an established fact. There is though, one problem, even amongst believers, there is still debate about the true nature of God. When people say they believe in God, most of time they are monotheists, people who believe in One God. Then there are polytheists who believe in many Gods. After the two main ideas, there are the more unique ideas such as deism, pantheism, and others. This essay aims to explore the true nature of God, and thus will start from the logical deduction of the previous essay, that is there can only be One True Consciousness, that is God.

Natures of God

As deduced from the previous essay, there can only be one conscious being, or consciousness that is sure to exist. Because we can never know if other people are conscious or not simply by interacting with them. Even if we become other people, then we simply switch bodies, and thus gives no more evidence on the existence of other consciousness. As such, we can also deduce that God is one, there can only be one God, as there can only be one consciousness. As a result, it can be determined with complete certainty that God is One, no more, for that is impossible, and no less, for existence proves that there is God. God is also conscious, and that is an essence of God, and thus requires no further elaboration.

Every conscious being has an identity and a form, including its formlessness if it is formless. But an identity will be required, even if it is a dead emotionless identity. As such, God too has identity and form, but not as most religions describe. The mistake done by most major religions are applying a fixed identity and form to God, this kind of believe is known as the Personal God. But truly, God has no true identity or form, including their formlessness. The formlessness of God is a natural condition, but not a true condition of God. As normality does not equate with the truth. God has infinite identities and forms, but none of it is a true condition of God.

God is also omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient, but not omnibenevolence. As omnibenevolence would limit the scope of God and mean that God has a true identity of an all loving God. As such, God is able to do all things and violate the physical laws if they wish to do so. God is everywhere at the same time and encompasses everything, either with a form or without a form. God knows everything that has been known, is being known, and will be known. God also sees everything that has happened, is happening, and will happen.

God is also by nature, composed of pure energy and consciousness. As such, everything that exists is God in itself, though more accurately, the manifestations of God. As everything is composed of energy, directly or indirectly as matter, then for God to be the cause and source, God must be energy itself. This also explains the omnipresent nature of God.

One Consciousness

The deduction that there can only be one consciousness that is sure to exist brings some implications and problems. If it is true, then am “I” God? As the author only sees through the perspective of the author, in the author’s eyes, that is “my” eyes, “I”, or the author is God. Is that so? And what about everyone else? Don’t their perspectives matter as well here? Let us review the nature of God. God has infinite identities that may exist independently as “separate” beings, “separate” as they are still one single consciousness, only different sides of that consciousness.

This means that “I”, the author and everyone else that has existed, is existing, and will exist are all mere different identities of God, but it does not end there. To say that would assume that these identities live separately from each other and will continue to be so. But all of us are much more connected, through time. When “I”, the consciousness experiences time, “I” am merely moving through different instances of space. And each instance of space is its own existence and universe. Furthermore, since “I” am only moving through such instances, it means that all of those instances still exist as I move through space. As a result, there is only one instance of time, that is now, and everything happens now, every instance of space coexists together. The difference is where the consciousness, or “I” am in those instances of space. The past and the future are merely instances of space, where the consciousness is absent.

At this current lifetime, “I” have some friends, and so, who are they? From the current instance of the consciousness, the perspective is from the author of this essay, but at the same time, the consciousness also resides within the author’s friends. The thing that differs the author and his friends is one thing, age. Imagine this, you are in a room with many people. You notice that all of that people are yourself, the only difference is the ages. You see yourself when you were a child, you see yourself as a teen, and you see yourself as an adult. Imagine your age is 14, currently, you take the perspective of yourself aged 14 and can see the 15 year old version of yourself as a separate human. But when you turn 15, then you will take the perspective of the 15 year old you, and you will see the 14 year old you that you just left.

Perhaps you, the reader may be brought into the illustration as well. Right now, the consciousness takes the perspective of the author of this essay, at least from this perspective. As such in the eyes of the consciousness right now, “I” am the author of the essay writing this essay. But there will come a time where “I” would take the perspective of one of you readers, and “I” would be reading this essay that “I” actually wrote in previous instances of “I” and space. As such, everyone is merely different instances of each other. From the perspective of the author, everyone the author knows is merely a different stage of the consciousness, that is of “I”. Thus, when the author talks to his friends, he is merely talking to different forms of himself, which are also just as conscious as the author, but is not being experienced by the consciousness that is currently experiencing the author.

 All of this may seem hard to understand, but know this. When you interact with others, it is as if you are interacting with yourself across time, but not only across time, across space as well. The others are also the consciousness that you are right now, but they are in a different instance of space than you are. Even if they are in a different instance of space, they are still in the same timeframe, that is now, you as the consciousness is simply not experiencing them, yet. As such, whatever you do to others, you will experience it, as you are merely doing it to yourself. When you love others, you will experience it, as you are merely doing it to yourself.

The fact that there is only one consciousness means that you, if taken from your perspective, or “I”, if taken from the author’s perspective, are alone in the existence. “I” am merely interacting with myself, and when “I” am in conflict, it is a self internal conflict, one that spans across time and space. As such, “I” am everything that has existed, is existing, and will exist. “I” manifest as the author, as you, as everything in this world. “I” am the source and cause of everything in this world, and as such this means one thing only. “I”, am no other than God.

Final Statements

We have arrived here in this second essay of God. The previous essay merely proved God’s existence, but explained nothing on the true nature of God. As a result of there being only one consciousness, “I” have to be God, as “I” am the consciousness and wherever “I” go as the consciousness. The fact that “I” am conscious is enough proof to declare that “I” am God. Everyone else is also God, but they are merely “I” in different instances of space that happens concurrently with “my” instance of space, but one that “I” as the consciousness is not experiencing at the current time. “I” am everything, and everything is “I”, “I” am God and God is “I”.